Select Page

how much is too much?

by | Oct 25, 2011 | Letterpress | 7 comments

You may have noticed that a significant portion of the work being produced by a fine press is produced by letterpress, a method of printing where a raised surface, coated in ink, is applied to paper to create an image. From Gutenberg through the first half of the last century, this was the most common form of printing. It’s since been replaced technologies that lower cost and increase efficiency.

Then a new argument was born

See, if you talk to an old-timer, you’ll hear the term “kiss impression” used when talking about this method. It basically means the forme (there’s that funky spelling again) barely touches the paper, leaving ink, but no impression. That’s not quite what we’re used to seeing today, huh? I know where the printers stand; they’re pretty neatly divided into the kissers and the smackers. You can read all sorts of entertaining discourse between the newbs and the old-timers here and here.

2011-10-25_14-36-15_265.jpg

That's a DEEP impression on some really thick paper.

2011-10-25_14-36-26_257.jpg

But the paper's not *that* thick. You can see the impression clearly on the reverse.

Frankly, what I’m interested in is what the client wants. So graphic designers, brides, wedding planners, business people; please tell me: what’s your take? Do you like that deep impression? How deep is too deep?

How much impression is too much? Is it even all that important?

7 Comments

  1. Kerri Percy

    I’m a huge admirer of letterpress – and when I think of the look of it, I don’t think “kiss.” It’s the dimension, the texture, the feel that’s unlike screenprinting, flexo or offset. Nothing offers such a beautiful treatment to paper as letterpress. Albeit, I’m from the old school, where we used rapidiograph pens to make logos, amberlith for color separations, and I can’t imagine paying for letterpress without the impression.

    • matthew

      I’ll have to show you one in person and see what you think. I love the front, but really am struggling with the tradeoff.

    • matthew

      Yours should get there in a day or two.

  2. Kelli Parker

    I love a deep impression but I’m not a fan of the show-through on the back. If I’m asking my printer to go deep, I make sure the paper is thick enough to handle it well.

    • matthew

      Kelli – That’s pretty much the way I feel. There’s only so much compression you can eek out, no matter how hard the packing.

      What are your brides saying?

7 Comments

  1. Kerri Percy

    I’m a huge admirer of letterpress – and when I think of the look of it, I don’t think “kiss.” It’s the dimension, the texture, the feel that’s unlike screenprinting, flexo or offset. Nothing offers such a beautiful treatment to paper as letterpress. Albeit, I’m from the old school, where we used rapidiograph pens to make logos, amberlith for color separations, and I can’t imagine paying for letterpress without the impression.

    • matthew

      I’ll have to show you one in person and see what you think. I love the front, but really am struggling with the tradeoff.

    • matthew

      Yours should get there in a day or two.

  2. Kelli Parker

    I love a deep impression but I’m not a fan of the show-through on the back. If I’m asking my printer to go deep, I make sure the paper is thick enough to handle it well.

    • matthew

      Kelli – That’s pretty much the way I feel. There’s only so much compression you can eek out, no matter how hard the packing.

      What are your brides saying?

Pin It on Pinterest